HASIB AHAMAD vs STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CRIMINAL — 519/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBH010012622026

Filing Number

1183/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

519/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

02

Police Station

RUPAI DIHA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HASIB AHAMAD

    Adv. ANEES KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CRIMINAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Bail Petition is RejectedView PDF

    Summary The Baharaich District Court rejected the bail plea of Hasib Ahmad, who is accused of causing the death of Shadab Ali by beating him with a stick. The court found sufficient evidence through the FIR, post-mortem report, and witness statements establishing that the accused committed the crime out of resentment over Shadab's love marriage with the accused's sister, making the offense grave in nature and bail inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 519/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Baharaich District Court rejected the bail plea of Hasib Ahmad, who is accused of causing the death of Shadab Ali by beating him with a stick. The court found sufficient evidence through the FIR, post-mortem report, and witness statements establishing that the accused committed the crime out of resentment over Shadab's love marriage with the accused's sister, making the offense grave in nature and bail inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case