SHUBHNKAR GUPTA vs State of U.P. — 475/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPBH010011452026
Filing Number
1069/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
475/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-1st Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
52
Police Station
RAMGaon
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHUBHNKAR GUPTA
Adv. BRIJPAL SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of U.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Bail Petition is AllowedView PDF
Summary The First Additional Sessions Court at Bahraich granted bail to Shubhankar Gupta in a case involving charges under BNS sections 61(2), 316(5), and the Public Property Act for alleged unauthorized transportation of school textbooks. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused was at the crime scene, had possession of the stolen property, or gained any financial benefit, and noted he had been in custody since February 22, 2026. Bail was approved on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
1st Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposal
1st Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposal
1st Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 475/2026
Summary The First Additional Sessions Court at Bahraich granted bail to Shubhankar Gupta in a case involving charges under BNS sections 61(2), 316(5), and the Public Property Act for alleged unauthorized transportation of school textbooks. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused was at the crime scene, had possession of the stolen property, or gained any financial benefit, and noted he had been in custody since February 22, 2026. Bail was approved on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts