DILSHAD vs State of U.P. — 477/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBH010011442026

Filing Number

1068/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

477/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-1st Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

52

Police Station

RAMGaon

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DILSHAD

    Adv. VINAY SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail Petition is AllowedView PDF

    Summary The court granted bail to the accused Dilshad (a registered scrap dealer) in a case involving alleged misappropriation of government textbooks. The court found that while the prosecution alleged conspiracy to damage public property, the accused's specific role was not clearly established, there were no independent witnesses, and the accused had been in jail since February 22, 2026. The court released him on bail of ₹50,000 personal bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and cooperation with the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposal

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposal

    1st Additional District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 477/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted bail to the accused Dilshad (a registered scrap dealer) in a case involving alleged misappropriation of government textbooks. The court found that while the prosecution alleged conspiracy to damage public property, the accused's specific role was not clearly established, there were no independent witnesses, and the accused had been in jail since February 22, 2026. The court released him on bail of ₹50,000 personal bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and cooperation with the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case