HARI OM SHARMA URF GUDDU SHARMA vs STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CRIMINAL — 25/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPBH010004052026

Filing Number

377/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

25/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARI OM SHARMA URF GUDDU SHARMA

    Adv. BUDDHI SAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CRIMINAL

  2. 2.RAJ VANTI URF SUNITA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Sessions Court at Bahraich dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Hariom Sharma, who challenged a magistrate's order rejecting his application under Section 173(4) BNS. The court upheld the magistrate's finding that Sharma's petition contained false and fabricated allegations against the respondent woman, and found no legal or factual error in the lower court's reasoned dismissal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court at Bahraich dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Hariom Sharma, who challenged a magistrate's order rejecting his application under Section 173(4) BNS. The court upheld the magistrate's finding that Sharma's petition contained false and fabricated allegations against the respondent woman, and found no legal or factual error in the lower court's reasoned dismissal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case