HANIF vs STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CRIMINAL — 184/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPBH010003872026

Filing Number

368/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

184/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

339

Police Station

FAKARPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HANIF

    Adv. GULAM MEHDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP Advocate - DGC CRIMINAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail Petition is AllowedView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of Bahraich granted anticipatory bail to Hanif (aged ~70) in a case involving cheating charges under Section 420 IPC. The court found that the applicant was not arrested by police during investigation, no criminal history was presented, no evidence collection remained pending, and a chargesheet had already been filed. The court approved the bail petition subject to a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of equal amount, along with conditions requiring the applicant's regular court appearance and full cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Disposal

    District and Sessions Judge Bahraich

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 184/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of Bahraich granted anticipatory bail to Hanif (aged ~70) in a case involving cheating charges under Section 420 IPC. The court found that the applicant was not arrested by police during investigation, no criminal history was presented, no evidence collection remained pending, and a chargesheet had already been filed. The court approved the bail petition subject to a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of equal amount, along with conditions requiring the applicant's regular court appearance and full cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case