NAVDEEP vs SANJEEV TYAGI AND ANOTHER — 182/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th March 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: UPBG010056032025
Filing Number
5295/2025
Filing Date
04-09-2025
Registration No
182/2025
Registration Date
04-09-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
8-ADJ(Special Judge Sc/St Act)
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAVDEEP
Adv. Prince Thakur
Respondent(s)
SANJEEV TYAGI AND ANOTHER
Hearing History
Judge: 8-ADJ(Special Judge Sc/St Act)
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 21-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-12-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Bagpat, accepted the criminal revision petition and set aside the trial court's order dated 06.08.2025 that dismissed a cheque bounce case (Section 138 NI Act) for the complainant's non-appearance. The court found that the trial court had provided insufficient opportunities (only three dates) for the complainant to present evidence and had rejected the complaint without adequately considering available evidence or providing reasoned grounds, thereby committing procedural irregularity. The case was remanded for fresh proceedings in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Bagpat, accepted the criminal revision petition and set aside the trial court's order dated 06.08.2025 that dismissed a cheque bounce case (Section 138 NI Act) for the complainant's non-appearance. The court found that the trial court had provided insufficient opportunities (only three dates) for the complainant to present evidence and had rejected the complaint without adequately considering available evidence or providing reasoned grounds, thereby committing procedural irregularity. The case was remanded for fresh proceedings in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts