KASHISH vs State of U.P. — 469/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,352,55,3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPBG010012962026
Filing Number
1241/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
469/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KASHISH
Adv. SATENDRA KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of U.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District & Session Judge
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Court at Bagpat granted bail to accused Kashshish in a firearms case (FIR under IPC Sections 109, 352, 3(5), 55 BNS) dated March 10, 2026. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the accused being named in the FIR related to a July 15, 2025 firing incident, noting that the co-accused's bail was already approved, the accused suffered no prior criminal history, and no injuries were sustained in the alleged shooting. The bail was granted on personal recognizance of ₹50,000 with standard conditions including non-repetition of offense and cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Court at Bagpat granted bail to accused Kashshish in a firearms case (FIR under IPC Sections 109, 352, 3(5), 55 BNS) dated March 10, 2026. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the accused being named in the FIR related to a July 15, 2025 firing incident, noting that the co-accused's bail was already approved, the accused suffered no prior criminal history, and no injuries were sustained in the alleged shooting. The bail was granted on personal recognizance of ₹50,000 with standard conditions including non-repetition of offense and cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts