PAWAN GOYAL vs State of U.P. Advocate - Inder Pal Singh — 241/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,115(2),351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPBG010006952026
Filing Number
673/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
241/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
8-ADJ(Special Judge Sc/St Act)
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
271
Police Station
SINGHWALI AHIR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PAWAN GOYAL
Adv. SURENDRA KUMAR MISHRA
Respondent(s)
State of U.P. Advocate - Inder Pal Singh
Hearing History
Judge: 8-ADJ(Special Judge Sc/St Act)
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 23-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 17-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 241/2026 — Pawan Goyal v. State of U.P. The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Pawan Goyal in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 352, 115(2), 351(2) and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(va), relating to alleged assault, abuse, and threats against a scheduled caste member. While the prosecution opposed bail, the court found sufficient grounds for release, noting the offense is bailable (punishable up to seven years), no misuse of interim bail was demonstrated, and bail conditions were adequate to ensure court attendance and prevent witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 241/2026 — Pawan Goyal v. State of U.P. The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Pawan Goyal in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 352, 115(2), 351(2) and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(va), relating to alleged assault, abuse, and threats against a scheduled caste member. While the prosecution opposed bail, the court found sufficient grounds for release, noting the offense is bailable (punishable up to seven years), no misuse of interim bail was demonstrated, and bail conditions were adequate to ensure court attendance and prevent witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts