State of U.P. vs SHRIOM Advocate - ANIL KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA — 200025/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.
Session Trial
CNR: UPBG010003902014
Filing Number
200025/2014
Filing Date
17-Jan-2014
Registration No
200025/2014
Registration Date
17-Jan-2014
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ I
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
183
Police Station
KHEKRA
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of U.P.
Adv. ADGC
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRIOM Advocate - ANIL KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
-
2.SETH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary of State of U.P. v. Shriom & Seth (Case 200025/2014) Case Details - Court: Additional Sessions Judge, Bagpat - Case Number: 200025/2014 (FIR 183/2012) - Charge: IPC Section 304 (causing death by negligence) - Accused: Shriom and Seth (alias Viresh); Vikrant was separated as juvenile - Decision Date: 09.04.2026 Facts On 14.02.2012, a quarrel occurred between the deceased Vikki (alias Vikash) and the accused near a school. The complainant's written report alleged the accused beat Vikki, causing head injuries that led to his death that night near a dairy. The prosecution claimed the accused struck Vikki's head with a brick. Key Court Findings The court acquitted both accused of charges under IPC Section 304, finding the prosecution case riddled with contradictions: Critical Contradictions Identified: 1. Witness Inconsistencies: Witness PW-02 (Ravi Kumar) gave three different versions—initially not mentioning the brick incident in his statement dated 23.02.2012, then adding it on 25.02.2012, and finally elaborating in court testimony. 2. Medical Evidence vs. Ocular Testimony: - Doctor stated Injury #1 (a lacerated wound) was NOT consistent with brick impact - Doctor stated death would be instantaneous from Injury #1 - Yet witness testified victim was alive until 5:00 PM that day 3. Timeline Issue: If injury occurred at 11:00 AM as alleged, victim should have died then. However, victim was alive at home until 5:00 PM same day, directly contradicting the prosecution's theory. 4. Post-Mortem Findings: No brick-related injuries found; injury #1 incompatible with brick strike. 5. Witness Credibility: Key witness was not present at the scene (admitted he didn't see the incident), making him hearsay-based rather than an eyewitness. Court's Reasoning The court applied the principle that: - Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt - Material contradictions in witness testimony favor the accused - Medical evidence contradicting ocular testimony creates reasonable doubt - Witness improvements/additions across statements reduce credibility The court cited precedents emphasizing that contradictions in prosecution's own evidence must benefit the accused. Order Both accused acquitted under IPC Section 304 with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ I
-
03-Apr-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
27-Mar-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
20-Mar-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
19-Feb-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
17-Feb-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
06-Feb-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
23-Jan-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
19-Jan-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
14-Jan-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
13-Jan-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
09-Jan-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
08-Jan-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
05-Jan-2026
Arguments
ADJ I
-
17-Dec-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
15-Dec-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
11-Dec-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
03-Dec-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
27-Nov-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
21-Nov-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
15-Nov-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
11-Nov-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
29-Oct-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
17-Oct-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
10-Oct-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
23-Sep-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
12-Sep-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
05-Sep-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
01-Sep-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
28-Aug-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
19-Aug-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
11-Aug-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
01-Aug-2025
Arguments
ADJ I
-
25-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
08-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
04-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
13-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
27-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
22-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
01-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
26-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
04-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
13-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
06-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
30-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
10-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
12-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
21-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
04-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
11-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
23-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
05-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
14-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
26-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
09-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
19-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
04-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
16-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
01-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
12-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
28-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
12-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
22-Feb-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
07-Feb-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
17-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
22-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
06-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
21-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
02-Nov-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
18-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
04-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Sep-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
28-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
09-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
20-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
28-Jun-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Jun-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
26-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
09-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
25-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
12-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
03-Apr-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
24-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
09-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
23-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
08-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
25-Jan-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
16-Jan-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
02-Jan-2023
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
24-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
12-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
29-Nov-2022
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Nov-2022
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
31-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
17-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
29-Sep-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
16-Sep-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
01-Sep-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
16-Aug-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
29-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
15-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
06-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
04-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
28-Jun-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
17-Jun-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
03-Jun-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
19-May-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
10-May-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
27-Apr-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
12-Apr-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
31-Mar-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
15-Mar-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
23-Feb-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
09-Feb-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
19-Jan-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
07-Jan-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
20-Dec-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
01-Dec-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
17-Nov-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
08-Nov-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
21-Oct-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
05-Oct-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
20-Sep-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
01-Sep-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
18-Aug-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
30-Jul-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
08-Jul-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
30-Jun-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
10-Jun-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
21-May-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
30-Apr-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
07-Apr-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
23-Mar-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
04-Mar-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
18-Feb-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
22-Jan-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
01-Jan-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
14-Dec-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
23-Nov-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
03-Nov-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
14-Oct-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
05-Oct-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
18-Sep-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
07-Sep-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
24-Aug-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
24-Jul-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
07-Jul-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
10-Jun-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
19-May-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
28-Apr-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
06-Apr-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
16-Mar-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
26-Feb-2020
Charge
Adj III
-
10-Feb-2020
Charge
Adj III
-
27-Jan-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
03-Jan-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
09-Dec-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
18-Nov-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
04-Nov-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Adj III
-
17-Oct-2019
Evidence
Adj III
-
03-Oct-2019
Evidence
Adj III
-
16-Sep-2019
Evidence
Adj III
-
26-Aug-2019
Evidence
Adj III
-
31-Jul-2019
Evidence
Adj III
-
15-Jul-2019
Evidence
ADJ I
-
01-Jul-2019
Evidence
ADJ I
-
10-Jun-2019
Evidence
ADJ I
-
24-May-2019
Evidence
ADJ I
-
09-May-2019
Evidence
ADJ I
-
26-Apr-2019
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Apr-2019
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
03-Apr-2019
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
19-Mar-2019
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
11-Mar-2019
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
25-Feb-2019
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
12-Feb-2019
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
31-Jan-2019
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
17-Jan-2019
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
07-Jan-2019
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
21-Dec-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
11-Dec-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
27-Nov-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
09-Nov-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
17-Oct-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
05-Oct-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
14-Sep-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
17-Aug-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
30-Jul-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
13-Jul-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
21-Jun-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
04-Jun-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
22-May-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
05-May-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
30-Apr-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
21-Mar-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
20-Mar-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
23-Feb-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
01-Feb-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
18-Jan-2018
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Dec-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Nov-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
26-Oct-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
05-Oct-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
18-Sep-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
31-Aug-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
08-Aug-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
17-Jul-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
29-Jun-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
01-Jun-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
12-May-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
20-Apr-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
31-Mar-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
07-Mar-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Feb-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
27-Jan-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
09-Jan-2017
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
06-Dec-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
09-Nov-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
17-Oct-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
15-Sep-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
12-Aug-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
06-Jul-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
21-Jun-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
23-May-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
25-Apr-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
30-Mar-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
04-Mar-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
11-Feb-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
12-Jan-2016
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
14-Dec-2015
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
19-Nov-2015
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
01-Oct-2015
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
11-Aug-2015
Prosecution Evidence
ADJ I
-
26-Jun-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2014
Case filed
Registration No. 200025/2014
Summary of State of U.P. v. Shriom & Seth (Case 200025/2014) Case Details - Court: Additional Sessions Judge, Bagpat - Case Number: 200025/2014 (FIR 183/2012) - Charge: IPC Section 304 (causing death by negligence) - Accused: Shriom and Seth (alias Viresh); Vikrant was separated as juvenile - Decision Date: 09.04.2026 Facts On 14.02.2012, a quarrel occurred between the deceased Vikki (alias Vikash) and the accused near a school. The complainant's written report alleged the accused beat Vikki, causing head injuries that led to his death that night near a dairy. The prosecution claimed the accused struck Vikki's head with a brick. Key Court Findings The court acquitted both accused of charges under IPC Section 304, finding the prosecution case riddled with contradictions: Critical Contradictions Identified: 1. Witness Inconsistencies: Witness PW-02 (Ravi Kumar) gave three different versions—initially not mentioning the brick incident in his statement dated 23.02.2012, then adding it on 25.02.2012, and finally elaborating in court testimony. 2. Medical Evidence vs. Ocular Testimony: - Doctor stated Injury #1 (a lacerated wound) was NOT consistent with brick impact - Doctor stated death would be instantaneous from Injury #1 - Yet witness testified victim was alive until 5:00 PM that day 3. Timeline Issue: If injury occurred at 11:00 AM as alleged, victim should have died then. However, victim was alive at home until 5:00 PM same day, directly contradicting the prosecution's theory. 4. Post-Mortem Findings: No brick-related injuries found; injury #1 incompatible with brick strike. 5. Witness Credibility: Key witness was not present at the scene (admitted he didn't see the incident), making him hearsay-based rather than an eyewitness. Court's Reasoning The court applied the principle that: - Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt - Material contradictions in witness testimony favor the accused - Medical evidence contradicting ocular testimony creates reasonable doubt - Witness improvements/additions across statements reduce credibility The court cited precedents emphasizing that contradictions in prosecution's own evidence must benefit the accused. Order Both accused acquitted under IPC Section 304 with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts