SHIVCHARAN RATHI vs Nagar Panchayat Tikri THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS — 3/2026

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Cases

CNR: UPBG010002572026

Filing Number

9/2026

Filing Date

14-Jan-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

14-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIVCHARAN RATHI

    Adv. SAUJI SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nagar Panchayat Tikri THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of U.P. DM

  3. 3.SDM BARAUT

  4. 4.TAHSILDAR BARAUT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    The court accepted the petitioner's application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, allowing the appeal against the lower court's order (dated 16.10.2025) in Civil Suit No. 327/2012 to proceed. The petitioner's delay in filing the appeal was caused by illness (fever) and his advanced age/physical infirmity, which prevented him from appearing in court despite obtaining the case copy on 21.11.2025. The court imposed a nominal cost of ₹500 as compensation to the respondents and directed parties to appear before the District Judge on 30.03.2026 for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ I

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ I

  8. 14-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 14-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the petitioner's application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, allowing the appeal against the lower court's order (dated 16.10.2025) in Civil Suit No. 327/2012 to proceed. The petitioner's delay in filing the appeal was caused by illness (fever) and his advanced age/physical infirmity, which prevented him from appearing in court despite obtaining the case copy on 21.11.2025. The court imposed a nominal cost of ₹500 as compensation to the respondents and directed parties to appear before the District Judge on 30.03.2026 for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case