Rambhawan vs Soorajbhan — 30/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Eviden ce. Next hearing: 09th March 2026 Date Not Updated.
Original Suit
CNR: UPBD120000452018
Filing Number
32/2018
Filing Date
23-Apr-2018
Registration No
30/2018
Registration Date
23-Apr-2018
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Atarra
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rambhawan
-
2.Rambharosa
Respondent(s)
-
1.Soorajbhan
-
2.Smt. Foolmati
Case History
-
09-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Feb-2026
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
05-Jan-2026
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
05-Dec-2025
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
06-Nov-2025
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
14-Oct-2025
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
09-Sep-2025
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
07-Aug-2025
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
08-Jul-2025
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
13-May-2025
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
30-Apr-2025
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
18-Feb-2025
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
21-Jan-2025
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
23-Oct-2024
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
02-Aug-2024
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
15-May-2024
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
22-Feb-2024
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
21-Feb-2024
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
18-Jan-2024
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
19-Oct-2023
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
18-Oct-2023
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
28-Jul-2023
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
19-Apr-2023
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
01-Feb-2023
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
16-Nov-2022
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
03-Sep-2022
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
04-Jul-2022
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
12-Apr-2022
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary Civil Suit No. 30/2018 - Civil Judge (JD), Atarra, Banda The court ruled on Issue No. 7 regarding whether the plaintiff has the right to maintain the suit for partition of the disputed property. The court decided Issue No. 7 in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, finding that the plaintiff has established a locus standi to sue for partition of the property that was constructed by their father. The case is adjourned for plaintiff's evidence on 04-07-2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Apr-2022
Eviden ce
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
07-Feb-2022
Issu es
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
25-Nov-2021
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
25-Nov-2021
Issu es
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
22-Sep-2021
Issu es
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
19-Jul-2021
Issu es
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
20-Apr-2021
Issu es
-
09-Mar-2021
Issu es
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
05-Jan-2021
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
16-Oct-2020
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
29-Jul-2020
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
04-May-2020
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
26-Feb-2020
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
24-Jan-2020
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
02-Nov-2019
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
11-Sep-2019
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
09-Jul-2019
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
29-Mar-2019
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
21-Jan-2019
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
02-Nov-2018
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
23-Aug-2018
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
24-May-2018
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
18-May-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Apr-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 30/2018
Case Summary Civil Suit No. 30/2018 - Civil Judge (JD), Atarra, Banda The court ruled on Issue No. 7 regarding whether the plaintiff has the right to maintain the suit for partition of the disputed property. The court decided Issue No. 7 in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, finding that the plaintiff has established a locus standi to sue for partition of the property that was constructed by their father. The case is adjourned for plaintiff's evidence on 04-07-2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts