Mithlesh Kumari vs Mohd. Sharif and others — 153/2019
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: For appearance of parties/advocates. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
Original Civil Suits
CNR: UPBB180002222019
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
222/2019
Filing Date
19-08-2019
Registration No
153/2019
Registration Date
19-08-2019
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Ramsanehighat
Judge
14-Civil Judge(Jr. Div.), Ram Sanehi Ghat
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mithlesh Kumari
Adv. Mr. Brijesh Mishra
Respondent(s)
Mohd. Sharif and others
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge(Jr. Div.), Ram Sanehi Ghat
For appearance of parties/advocates
For appearance of parties/advocates
For appearance of parties/advocates
For appearance of parties/advocates
For appearance of parties/advocates
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | For appearance of parties/advocates | |
| 14-01-2026 | For appearance of parties/advocates | |
| 08-12-2025 | For appearance of parties/advocates | |
| 07-10-2025 | For appearance of parties/advocates | |
| 20-08-2025 | For appearance of parties/advocates |
Interim Orders
Summary The Civil Court (Jr. Div.) in Barabanki granted an interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff (Smt. Mithlesh Kumari) against the defendants in a property dispute case. The court ordered the defendants to refrain from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and occupation of the disputed land (Gata No. 256, Area 1.2230 Ha.) until the next hearing date. The court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case based on revenue records showing her name as the owner, and directed the defendants to file their reply by September 19, 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Civil Court (Jr. Div.) in Barabanki granted an interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff (Smt. Mithlesh Kumari) against the defendants in a property dispute case. The court ordered the defendants to refrain from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and occupation of the disputed land (Gata No. 256, Area 1.2230 Ha.) until the next hearing date. The court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case based on revenue records showing her name as the owner, and directed the defendants to file their reply by September 19, 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts