ram kishor vs devi dayal — 172/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section injunction. Status: Interim Hearing/Hearing applications/bail. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
Original Civil Suits
CNR: UPBB180002172017
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
219/2017
Filing Date
18-10-2017
Registration No
172/2017
Registration Date
18-10-2017
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Ramsanehighat
Judge
14-Civil Judge(Jr. Div.), Ram Sanehi Ghat
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ram kishor
Respondent(s)
devi dayal
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge(Jr. Div.), Ram Sanehi Ghat
Interim Hearing/Hearing applications/bail
Interim Hearing/Hearing applications/bail
Interim Hearing/Hearing applications/bail
Interim Hearing/Hearing applications/bail
Interim Hearing/Hearing applications/bail
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Interim Hearing/Hearing applications/bail | |
| 30-01-2026 | Interim Hearing/Hearing applications/bail | |
| 19-12-2025 | Interim Hearing/Hearing applications/bail | |
| 05-11-2025 | Interim Hearing/Hearing applications/bail | |
| 09-10-2025 | Interim Hearing/Hearing applications/bail |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this civil suit (No. 172/2017) between Ram Kishor and Devi Dyal, decided on 26.04.2019 by the Civil Judge at Barabanki, the court dismissed three preliminary issues (Issue Points 3, 4, and 5) against the plaintiff. Issue 3 regarding whether the defendant was a minor was dismissed for lack of evidence, Issue 4 regarding inadequate court fees was dismissed as proper valuation and fees were paid, and Issue 5 regarding the court's territorial jurisdiction was dismissed as the suit valuation fell within the court's jurisdiction. The case was adjourned for the plaintiff's examination on 20.07.2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this civil suit (No. 172/2017) between Ram Kishor and Devi Dyal, decided on 26.04.2019 by the Civil Judge at Barabanki, the court dismissed three preliminary issues (Issue Points 3, 4, and 5) against the plaintiff. Issue 3 regarding whether the defendant was a minor was dismissed for lack of evidence, Issue 4 regarding inadequate court fees was dismissed as proper valuation and fees were paid, and Issue 5 regarding the court's territorial jurisdiction was dismissed as the suit valuation fell within the court's jurisdiction. The case was adjourned for the plaintiff's examination on 20.07.2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts