Saroj Prasad Misra vs Virendra Kumar — 1400065/2008
Status: Objection/Disposal. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
Original Civil Suits
CNR: UPBB180000182008
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1400065/2008
Filing Date
07-03-2008
Registration No
1400065/2008
Registration Date
07-03-2008
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division Ramsanehighat
Judge
14-Civil Judge(Jr. Div.), Ram Sanehi Ghat
Petitioner(s)
Saroj Prasad Misra
Respondent(s)
Virendra Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge(Jr. Div.), Ram Sanehi Ghat
Objection/Disposal
Objection/Disposal
Objection/Disposal
Objection/Disposal
Objection/Disposal
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Objection/Disposal | |
| 07-03-2026 | Objection/Disposal | |
| 30-01-2026 | Objection/Disposal | |
| 12-01-2026 | Objection/Disposal | |
| 22-12-2025 | Objection/Disposal |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Civil Judge dismissed Application No. 54 filed by the defendant, which sought an order to remove a deteriorating old wall near the plaintiff's property that posed a safety risk. The court found that the defendant's application lacked sufficient evidence and was inconsistent with the commission report and previous court orders, and that both parties were bound by an earlier decree already passed in the suit. The case is adjourned for the plaintiff to present evidence on 25.04.2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Civil Judge dismissed Application No. 54 filed by the defendant, which sought an order to remove a deteriorating old wall near the plaintiff's property that posed a safety risk. The court found that the defendant's application lacked sufficient evidence and was inconsistent with the commission report and previous court orders, and that both parties were bound by an earlier decree already passed in the suit. The case is adjourned for the plaintiff to present evidence on 25.04.2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts