Mohd Ashfak Ahmad vs Taj Bano Khan — 85/2022
Case under Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (regulation of Letting, Rent &. Eviction) Act, 1972 Section 30(1). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED/REJECTED OTHERWISE on 18th April 2026.
Misc. Civil Cases
CNR: UPBB010029032022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
311/2022
Filing Date
24-05-2022
Registration No
85/2022
Registration Date
24-05-2022
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED/REJECTED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohd Ashfak Ahmad
Adv. Deepak Kumar Verma
Respondent(s)
Taj Bano Khan
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4
Disposed
For orders
For orders
For orders
For orders
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-04-2026 | For orders | |
| 03-04-2026 | For orders | |
| 25-03-2026 | For orders | |
| 10-03-2026 | For orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the miscellaneous civil suit filed by Mo. Ashfak Ahmad against Smt. Taabano under Section 30(1) of Act No. 13/1972 due to the applicant's repeated absence from hearings despite multiple summons and final warning. The court found no genuine interest in pursuing the case as no application for adjournment was filed, warranting dismissal in the applicant's absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the miscellaneous civil suit filed by Mo. Ashfak Ahmad against Smt. Taabano under Section 30(1) of Act No. 13/1972 due to the applicant's repeated absence from hearings despite multiple summons and final warning. The court found no genuine interest in pursuing the case as no application for adjournment was filed, warranting dismissal in the applicant's absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts