Kusuma Devi vs Pradeep Kumar Srivastava — 11/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O43R1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Appeal

CNR: UPBB010004382022

Filing Number

76/2022

Filing Date

25-Jan-2022

Registration No

11/2022

Registration Date

25-Jan-2022

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O43R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kusuma Devi

    Adv. Subhash Chandra Srivastava

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary Kusuma Devi vs Pradeep Kumar Srivastava (Misc Civil Appeal No. 11/2022, Barabanki) The appellate court allowed the appeal and set aside the trial court's order dated 18-12-2021 regarding an interim injunction. The court found the lower court's order violated the three essential principles for granting interim injunctions under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC: it failed to provide reasoned analysis on prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. The order was deemed contradictory and ambiguous—simultaneously restraining both parties while directing defendant not to interfere with plaintiff's possession. The matter was remitted to the trial court for fresh consideration with proper legal reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    For orders

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  11. 09-Oct-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  12. 15-Sep-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  13. 11-Aug-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  14. 10-Jul-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  15. 27-May-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  16. 28-Apr-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  17. 28-Mar-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  18. 25-Feb-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  19. 23-Jan-2025

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  20. 19-Dec-2024

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Court no.-4

  21. 06-Nov-2024

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  22. 23-Sep-2024

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  23. 29-Aug-2024

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  24. 19-Jul-2024

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  25. 29-May-2024

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  26. 04-Apr-2024

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  27. 20-Feb-2024

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  28. 04-Jan-2024

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  29. 06-Nov-2023

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  30. 06-Oct-2023

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  31. 11-Aug-2023

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  32. 21-Jul-2023

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  33. 25-May-2023

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  34. 21-Apr-2023

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  35. 29-Mar-2023

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  36. 02-Feb-2023

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  37. 02-Jan-2023

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  38. 23-Nov-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge(POCSO Act 2012), Court Room No.-45

  39. 09-Nov-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Spl. Judge(SC/ST Act)

  40. 20-Oct-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Spl. Judge(SC/ST Act)

  41. 11-Oct-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Spl. Judge(SC/ST Act)

  42. 03-Oct-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Spl. Judge(SC/ST Act)

  43. 26-Sep-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Spl. Judge(SC/ST Act)

  44. 12-Sep-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Spl. Judge(SC/ST Act)

  45. 22-Aug-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Spl. Judge(SC/ST Act)

  46. 27-Jul-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Spl. Judge(SC/ST Act)

  47. 04-Jul-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    Spl. Judge(SC/ST Act)

  48. 18-May-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    District & Sessions Judge

  49. 25-Apr-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    District & Sessions Judge

  50. 07-Apr-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    District & Sessions Judge

  51. 21-Mar-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    District & Sessions Judge

  52. 25-Feb-2022

    For appearance of parties/advocates

    District & Sessions Judge

  53. 14-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 25-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Kusuma Devi vs Pradeep Kumar Srivastava (Misc Civil Appeal No. 11/2022, Barabanki) The appellate court allowed the appeal and set aside the trial court's order dated 18-12-2021 regarding an interim injunction. The court found the lower court's order violated the three essential principles for granting interim injunctions under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC: it failed to provide reasoned analysis on prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury. The order was deemed contradictory and ambiguous—simultaneously restraining both parties while directing defendant not to interfere with plaintiff's possession. The matter was remitted to the trial court for fresh consideration with proper legal reasoning. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case