SONI vs RAJKUMAR — 15/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200. Disposed: Uncontested--DISCHARGE on 10th March 2026.
COMPLAINT
CNR: UPAU120008152022
Filing Number
558/2022
Filing Date
18-04-2022
Registration No
15/2022
Registration Date
18-04-2022
Court
Civil Judge Jr. Division, Bidhuna
Judge
1-Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISCHARGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SONI
Adv. RITESH SRIWASTAV
Respondent(s)
RAJKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 03-12-2025 | Arguments |
| 11-11-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court discharged all four accused persons (Rajkumar, Manoj Kumar, Prakashi Devi, and Soni) under Section 245 of the CrPC in a dowry harassment case (Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act). The court found that despite multiple opportunities, the complainant failed to present any substantive evidence and repeatedly absented herself from court, thereby denying the accused a fair opportunity to challenge the allegations. Applying established legal precedent, the court held that discharge was justified as no prima facie case had been established against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court discharged all four accused persons (Rajkumar, Manoj Kumar, Prakashi Devi, and Soni) under Section 245 of the CrPC in a dowry harassment case (Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act). The court found that despite multiple opportunities, the complainant failed to present any substantive evidence and repeatedly absented herself from court, thereby denying the accused a fair opportunity to challenge the allegations. Applying established legal precedent, the court held that discharge was justified as no prima facie case had been established against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts