State of U.P. vs SHIVAM — 231/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Granted on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPAU120006242026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
455/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
231/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Civil Judge Jr. Division, Bidhuna
Judge
2-ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (J.D.) OUTLINE COURT BIDHUNA
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
35
Police Station
Kudarkot
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of U.P.
Adv. advocate
Respondent(s)
SHIVAM
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (J.D.) OUTLINE COURT BIDHUNA
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) at Bidhuna, Uttar Pradesh granted bail to the accused persons on March 10, 2026, in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, and 351(2). The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on the facts that the accused had never been arrested during investigation, had cooperated in the proceedings, and the offense carried a maximum punishment of 7 years, relying on precedent established in *Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022)*. Each accused was released on bail of ₹20,000 with one surety of equal amount, on the condition of regular court attendance and cooperation in the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) at Bidhuna, Uttar Pradesh granted bail to the accused persons on March 10, 2026, in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, and 351(2). The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on the facts that the accused had never been arrested during investigation, had cooperated in the proceedings, and the offense carried a maximum punishment of 7 years, relying on precedent established in *Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022)*. Each accused was released on bail of ₹20,000 with one surety of equal amount, on the condition of regular court attendance and cooperation in the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts