State of U.P. vs SHIVAM — 231/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Granted on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPAU120006242026

Filing Number

455/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

231/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Jr. Division, Bidhuna

Judge

2-Additional CIVIL Judge (J.d.) Outline Court Bidhuna

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Granted

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

Kudarkot

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

    Adv. advocate

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIVAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) at Bidhuna, Uttar Pradesh granted bail to the accused persons on March 10, 2026, in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, and 351(2). The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on the facts that the accused had never been arrested during investigation, had cooperated in the proceedings, and the offense carried a maximum punishment of 7 years, relying on precedent established in *Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022)*. Each accused was released on bail of ₹20,000 with one surety of equal amount, on the condition of regular court attendance and cooperation in the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional CIVIL Judge (J.d.) Outline Court Bidhuna

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 231/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) at Bidhuna, Uttar Pradesh granted bail to the accused persons on March 10, 2026, in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, and 351(2). The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on the facts that the accused had never been arrested during investigation, had cooperated in the proceedings, and the offense carried a maximum punishment of 7 years, relying on precedent established in *Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022)*. Each accused was released on bail of ₹20,000 with one surety of equal amount, on the condition of regular court attendance and cooperation in the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case