State of U.P. vs AKHILESH YADAV — 229/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,452,504,506. Disposed: Uncontested--Granted on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPAU120006222026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
453/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
229/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Civil Judge Jr. Division, Bidhuna
Judge
2-ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (J.D.) OUTLINE COURT BIDHUNA
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
133
Police Station
Erwa Katra
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of U.P.
Adv. advocate
Respondent(s)
AKHILESH YADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (J.D.) OUTLINE COURT BIDHUNA
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) in Auriya granted bail to the accused (Akhilesh Yadav) in a criminal case under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506, and 452. The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on the principles laid down in *Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI* (2022), noting that the accused was never arrested during investigation, cooperated in proceedings, and the offense carries punishment of less than 7 years. The accused was released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹20,000 and a surety of equal amount, with conditions to appear regularly in court and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) in Auriya granted bail to the accused (Akhilesh Yadav) in a criminal case under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506, and 452. The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on the principles laid down in *Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI* (2022), noting that the accused was never arrested during investigation, cooperated in proceedings, and the offense carries punishment of less than 7 years. The accused was released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹20,000 and a surety of equal amount, with conditions to appear regularly in court and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts