State of U.P. vs AKHILESH YADAV — 229/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,452,504,506. Disposed: Uncontested--Granted on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPAU120006222026

Filing Number

453/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

229/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Jr. Division, Bidhuna

Judge

2-Additional CIVIL Judge (J.d.) Outline Court Bidhuna

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Granted

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

133

Police Station

Erwa Katra

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,452,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

    Adv. advocate

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AKHILESH YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) in Auriya granted bail to the accused (Akhilesh Yadav) in a criminal case under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506, and 452. The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on the principles laid down in *Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI* (2022), noting that the accused was never arrested during investigation, cooperated in proceedings, and the offense carries punishment of less than 7 years. The accused was released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹20,000 and a surety of equal amount, with conditions to appear regularly in court and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional CIVIL Judge (J.d.) Outline Court Bidhuna

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 229/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) in Auriya granted bail to the accused (Akhilesh Yadav) in a criminal case under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506, and 452. The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on the principles laid down in *Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI* (2022), noting that the accused was never arrested during investigation, cooperated in proceedings, and the offense carries punishment of less than 7 years. The accused was released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹20,000 and a surety of equal amount, with conditions to appear regularly in court and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case