RAM SINGH vs ANIT DEVI — 58/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Status: WS/ISSUES. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Civil Suit

CNR: UPAU120002092024

WS/ISSUES

Next Hearing

06th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

62/2024

Filing Date

23-01-2024

Registration No

58/2024

Registration Date

23-01-2024

Court

Civil Judge Jr. Division, Bidhuna

Judge

1-Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 00

Petitioner(s)

RAM SINGH

Adv. SUMOD KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

ANIT DEVI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya

10-03-2026

WS/ISSUES

06-01-2026

WS/ISSUES

14-10-2025

WS/ISSUES

22-07-2025

WS/ISSUES

22-05-2025

WS/ISSUES

Interim Orders

27-11-2024
Order

Case Summary Civil Case No. 58/2024 | Ramsingh v. Anuita Devi | Bidhuna, Auriya | Date: 27.11.2024 The court granted an interim injunction (temporary restraining order) in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff's plea for temporary injunction regarding disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 355, measuring 0.3970 hectares) was accepted after the court found that the plaintiff has established a prima facie case of ownership and possession, the balance of convenience favors the plaintiff, and irreparable harm would result if the relief is denied. Both parties are directed to maintain the property in its current status quo pending final determination of the case. The matter is adjourned to 14.01.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Civil Case No. 58/2024 | Ramsingh v. Anuita Devi | Bidhuna, Auriya | Date: 27.11.2024 The court granted an interim injunction (temporary restraining order) in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff's plea for temporary injunction regarding disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 355, measuring 0.3970 hectares) was accepted after the court found that the plaintiff has established a prima facie case of ownership and possession, the balance of convenience favors the plaintiff, and irreparable harm would result if the relief is denied. Both parties are directed to maintain the property in its current status quo pending final determination of the case. The matter is adjourned to 14.01.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Jr. Division, Bidhuna All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case