RAM SINGH vs ANIT DEVI — 58/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Status: WS/ISSUES. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: UPAU120002092024
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
62/2024
Filing Date
23-01-2024
Registration No
58/2024
Registration Date
23-01-2024
Court
Civil Judge Jr. Division, Bidhuna
Judge
1-Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAM SINGH
Adv. SUMOD KUMAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
ANIT DEVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya
WS/ISSUES
WS/ISSUES
WS/ISSUES
WS/ISSUES
WS/ISSUES
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | WS/ISSUES | |
| 06-01-2026 | WS/ISSUES | |
| 14-10-2025 | WS/ISSUES | |
| 22-07-2025 | WS/ISSUES | |
| 22-05-2025 | WS/ISSUES |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Civil Case No. 58/2024 | Ramsingh v. Anuita Devi | Bidhuna, Auriya | Date: 27.11.2024 The court granted an interim injunction (temporary restraining order) in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff's plea for temporary injunction regarding disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 355, measuring 0.3970 hectares) was accepted after the court found that the plaintiff has established a prima facie case of ownership and possession, the balance of convenience favors the plaintiff, and irreparable harm would result if the relief is denied. Both parties are directed to maintain the property in its current status quo pending final determination of the case. The matter is adjourned to 14.01.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Civil Case No. 58/2024 | Ramsingh v. Anuita Devi | Bidhuna, Auriya | Date: 27.11.2024 The court granted an interim injunction (temporary restraining order) in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff's plea for temporary injunction regarding disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 355, measuring 0.3970 hectares) was accepted after the court found that the plaintiff has established a prima facie case of ownership and possession, the balance of convenience favors the plaintiff, and irreparable harm would result if the relief is denied. Both parties are directed to maintain the property in its current status quo pending final determination of the case. The matter is adjourned to 14.01.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts