VINEET KUMAR vs SUDHEER KUMAR — 7/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.
Warrant or Summons Criminal Case
CNR: UPAU120000222026
Next Hearing
28th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
18/2026
Filing Date
02-01-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
02-01-2026
Court
Civil Judge Jr. Division, Bidhuna
Judge
1-Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VINEET KUMAR
Adv. advocate
Respondent(s)
SUDHEER KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Outlying Court Bidhuna, Auraiya
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 17-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 31-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Civil Judge (JD) of Bidhuna, Auraiya (Uttar Pradesh) ordered that accused Sudhir Kumar be summoned under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for trial on 10.02.2026. The complainant Vineet Kumar alleged that Sudhir Kumar borrowed ₹1,00,000, repaid ₹20,000, and issued a cheque for ₹80,000 that was dishonored on 12.11.2025 despite legal notice served on 03.12.2025. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of the offense and directed the accused to appear on the next hearing fixed for 10.03.2026; the complainant was ordered to produce surety within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Civil Judge (JD) of Bidhuna, Auraiya (Uttar Pradesh) ordered that accused Sudhir Kumar be summoned under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for trial on 10.02.2026. The complainant Vineet Kumar alleged that Sudhir Kumar borrowed ₹1,00,000, repaid ₹20,000, and issued a cheque for ₹80,000 that was dishonored on 12.11.2025 despite legal notice served on 03.12.2025. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of the offense and directed the accused to appear on the next hearing fixed for 10.03.2026; the complainant was ordered to produce surety within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts