Dharmendra Yadav vs U.P State Government — 29/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 17th March 2026.

CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: UPAU010029802025

Case disposed

Filing Number

2912/2025

Filing Date

30-06-2025

Registration No

29/2025

Registration Date

30-06-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No - 2 Auraiya

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415

Petitioner(s)

Dharmendra Yadav

Adv. Om narayan mishra

Respondent(s)

U.P State Government

Saurabh Tiwari

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No - 2 Auraiya

17-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Judgement

24-02-2026

Hearing

12-02-2026

Hearing

05-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary The court dismissed Dharmendra Yadav's criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that Yadav had issued four dishonored cheques totaling ₹1,90,000 to complainant Saurabh Tiwari (a seed and pesticide retailer) as advance payment for seeds and pesticides that were never supplied as promised, and subsequently failed to return the money despite legal notice within the prescribed 30-day period, warranting his conviction and sentencing to 6 months imprisonment with a fine of ₹2,50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court dismissed Dharmendra Yadav's criminal appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that Yadav had issued four dishonored cheques totaling ₹1,90,000 to complainant Saurabh Tiwari (a seed and pesticide retailer) as advance payment for seeds and pesticides that were never supplied as promised, and subsequently failed to return the money despite legal notice within the prescribed 30-day period, warranting his conviction and sentencing to 6 months imprisonment with a fine of ₹2,50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case