U.P State Government vs Nishant jain alias Nishu — 456/2025
Case under Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3,4. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPAU010017562025
Filing Number
1710/2025
Filing Date
10-Apr-2025
Registration No
456/2025
Registration Date
10-Apr-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
851
Police Station
Dibiyapur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.U.P State Government
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nishant jain alias Nishu
-
2.padam chandra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused Nishanth Urf Nishu and others of charges under IPC Sections 85, 80 (dowry-related harassment) and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and alternatively under Section 302 IPC. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused demanded dowry or harassed the deceased, as witness testimonies did not corroborate the allegations and no evidence established the accused caused the victim's death by hanging. The court determined that all prosecution witnesses were unreliable, contradicted each other, and the circumstantial evidence was insufficient to convict the accused under the dowry death provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
16-Mar-2026
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
13-Mar-2026
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
10-Mar-2026
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
26-Feb-2026
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
11-Feb-2026
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
21-Jan-2026
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
12-Jan-2026
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
20-Dec-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
08-Dec-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
26-Nov-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
21-Nov-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
17-Nov-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
13-Nov-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
31-Oct-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
16-Oct-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
04-Oct-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
18-Sep-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
06-Sep-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
05-Sep-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
22-Aug-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
11-Aug-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
30-Jul-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
17-Jul-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
03-Jul-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
19-Jun-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
05-Jun-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
23-May-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
09-May-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
25-Apr-2025
Charge
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
11-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 456/2025
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused Nishanth Urf Nishu and others of charges under IPC Sections 85, 80 (dowry-related harassment) and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, and alternatively under Section 302 IPC. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused demanded dowry or harassed the deceased, as witness testimonies did not corroborate the allegations and no evidence established the accused caused the victim's death by hanging. The court determined that all prosecution witnesses were unreliable, contradicted each other, and the circumstantial evidence was insufficient to convict the accused under the dowry death provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts