Ram Shree vs Deewan Singh alias Man Singh — 1/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CR. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 17th March 2026.

Civil Revision

CNR: UPAU010011002025

Case disposed

Filing Number

29/2025

Filing Date

03-03-2025

Registration No

1/2025

Registration Date

03-03-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Auraiya

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section CR

Petitioner(s)

Ram Shree

Adv. Sunil kumar saxena

Respondent(s)

Deewan Singh alias Man Singh

Rajendra Singh alias Raju

Lakshmi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge Auraiya

17-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Hearing

23-02-2026

Hearing

18-02-2026

Hearing

07-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Judgement

Summary The District Judge of Auriya set aside a unilateral court order dated 06.01.2024 passed against Respondent No. 3, accepting her petition (141-x) with a fee of Rs. 1,000. The court found that the lower court failed to properly consider Respondent No. 3's objections when accepting the petition and violated natural justice principles by not affording full opportunity to all parties before passing the ex-parte order. The appellate court emphasized that all stakeholders must receive adequate hearing before judicial orders are issued and dismissed the revision petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Judge of Auriya set aside a unilateral court order dated 06.01.2024 passed against Respondent No. 3, accepting her petition (141-x) with a fee of Rs. 1,000. The court found that the lower court failed to properly consider Respondent No. 3's objections when accepting the petition and violated natural justice principles by not affording full opportunity to all parties before passing the ex-parte order. The appellate court emphasized that all stakeholders must receive adequate hearing before judicial orders are issued and dismissed the revision petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case