state of uttar pradesh vs ghanshyam — 400010/2015
Case under Electricity Act Section 138.B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.
Special Trial
CNR: UPAU010010202015
Filing Date
03-12-2015
Registration No
400010/2015
Registration Date
03-12-2015
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
11-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No - 1 Auraiya
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
.
Police Station
Auraiya
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state of uttar pradesh
Respondent(s)
ghanshyam
Hearing History
Judge: 11-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No - 1 Auraiya
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Court under the Electricity Act in Auraiya acquitted the accused Ghanshyam (son of Radha Krishna) of charges under Section 138(B) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had knowingly made unauthorized electrical connections and used electricity without payment. The court observed significant contradictions in witness testimonies, procedural irregularities in the investigation, and insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged electricity theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Special Court under the Electricity Act in Auraiya acquitted the accused Ghanshyam (son of Radha Krishna) of charges under Section 138(B) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had knowingly made unauthorized electrical connections and used electricity without payment. The court observed significant contradictions in witness testimonies, procedural irregularities in the investigation, and insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged electricity theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts