Awadesh Mishra vs U.P State Government — 335/2026
Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (prevention) Act, 1986 Section 3(1),. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPAU010008852026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
848/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
335/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge/FTC - I Auraiya
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Awadesh Mishra
Adv. HIRDAY NARAYAN PANDEY
Respondent(s)
U.P State Government
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge/FTC - I Auraiya
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the bail application of Avdhesh Mishra, accused under Section 3(1) of the UP Gangster Act in Case No. 97/2024 (Auraiya). The court found that the accused is an active member of an organized criminal gang involved in extortion, murder, and other serious crimes, with two criminal cases registered against him including charges under IPC Section 302. Despite the accused's arguments about mistaken identity and lack of criminal history, the court determined there was sufficient basis to believe the accused committed the offenses alleged and posed a flight risk if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the bail application of Avdhesh Mishra, accused under Section 3(1) of the UP Gangster Act in Case No. 97/2024 (Auraiya). The court found that the accused is an active member of an organized criminal gang involved in extortion, murder, and other serious crimes, with two criminal cases registered against him including charges under IPC Section 302. Despite the accused's arguments about mistaken identity and lack of criminal history, the court determined there was sufficient basis to believe the accused committed the offenses alleged and posed a flight risk if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts