Awadesh Mishra vs U.P State Government — 335/2026
Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 3(1). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPAU010008852026
Filing Number
848/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
335/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Awadesh Mishra
Adv. HIRDAY NARAYAN PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.U.P State Government
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
The court rejected the bail application of Avdhesh Mishra, accused under Section 3(1) of the UP Gangster Act in Case No. 97/2024 (Auraiya). The court found that the accused is an active member of an organized criminal gang involved in extortion, murder, and other serious crimes, with two criminal cases registered against him including charges under IPC Section 302. Despite the accused's arguments about mistaken identity and lack of criminal history, the court determined there was sufficient basis to believe the accused committed the offenses alleged and posed a flight risk if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District and Sessions Judge/Ftc - I Auraiya
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 335/2026
The court rejected the bail application of Avdhesh Mishra, accused under Section 3(1) of the UP Gangster Act in Case No. 97/2024 (Auraiya). The court found that the accused is an active member of an organized criminal gang involved in extortion, murder, and other serious crimes, with two criminal cases registered against him including charges under IPC Section 302. Despite the accused's arguments about mistaken identity and lack of criminal history, the court determined there was sufficient basis to believe the accused committed the offenses alleged and posed a flight risk if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts