Laxmi Narayan vs Adarsh Saxena — 74/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 20th April 2026.
Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPAU010008662026
Filing Number
830/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
74/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Special Judge (SC/ST ACT) Auraiya
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxmi Narayan
Adv. Mohammad Akaram
Respondent(s)
Adarsh Saxena
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Special Judge (SC/ST ACT) Auraiya
Disposed
Order/Disposal
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Order/Disposal |
| 06-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 04-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 02-04-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Auraiya, registered a petition by Lakshmi Narayan as a formal complaint (FIR equivalent) under Section 173(4) BNS against Adarsh Saksena and others. The petitioner alleged that Adarsh Saksena fraudulently induced him into a grain trading partnership, took approximately ₹5,05,000, partially repaid only ₹84,400, and refused to return the balance despite a settlement agreement. The petitioner also claimed he was assaulted, abused with caste slurs, and threatened with death on two separate occasions. The court, finding substantial prima facie evidence of financial cheating and supporting medical/documentary evidence, directed the petition be registered as a formal complaint for proceeding under complaint procedure with hearing scheduled for May 26, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Special Judge under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Auraiya, registered a petition by Lakshmi Narayan as a formal complaint (FIR equivalent) under Section 173(4) BNS against Adarsh Saksena and others. The petitioner alleged that Adarsh Saksena fraudulently induced him into a grain trading partnership, took approximately ₹5,05,000, partially repaid only ₹84,400, and refused to return the balance despite a settlement agreement. The petitioner also claimed he was assaulted, abused with caste slurs, and threatened with death on two separate occasions. The court, finding substantial prima facie evidence of financial cheating and supporting medical/documentary evidence, directed the petition be registered as a formal complaint for proceeding under complaint procedure with hearing scheduled for May 26, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts