Vinay KUmar vs U.P State Government — 338/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),109(1),74,333,352,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPAU010008552026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
819/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
338/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Special Judge (SC/ST ACT) Auraiya
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
29
Police Station
Achhalda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinay KUmar
Adv. Dharmendra singh Sengar
Krishna alias Sanu Tiwari alias Krishna
Respondent(s)
U.P State Government
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Special Judge (SC/ST ACT) Auraiya
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application (No. 338/2026) filed by Vinay Kumar and Krishna in case crime no. 29/2026 involving charges under IPC sections 115(2), 109(1), 74, 333, 352 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(1), 3(2)(v), 3(2)(Va), 3(1)(w). The dismissal was granted because the applicant's counsel declined to press the bail petition, and consequently the court rejected it for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application (No. 338/2026) filed by Vinay Kumar and Krishna in case crime no. 29/2026 involving charges under IPC sections 115(2), 109(1), 74, 333, 352 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(1), 3(2)(v), 3(2)(Va), 3(1)(w). The dismissal was granted because the applicant's counsel declined to press the bail petition, and consequently the court rejected it for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts