Ram Avtar vs Karan SIngh — 71/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th April 2026.

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPAU010008382026

Case disposed

Filing Number

803/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

71/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Special Judge (SC/ST ACT) Auraiya

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4)

Petitioner(s)

Ram Avtar

Adv. Arvind kumar

Respondent(s)

Karan SIngh

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Special Judge (SC/ST ACT) Auraiya

08-04-2026

Disposed

03-04-2026

Hearing

26-03-2026

Hearing

24-03-2026

Hearing

18-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
Disposal of Application

Court Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Atrocities Act) dismissed the petitioner Ramaoutar's plea under Section 173(4) BNSS to register an FIR against defendants Karan Singh and others. The court found that the core dispute was over land possession and a pathway between adjoining fields, not an atrocity case, and that preliminary investigation revealed no substantiating evidence for allegations of caste-based abuse or threats to life. The petitioner was deemed to have withheld material facts (police action under Sections 126/135 BNSS against both parties) and approached with unclean hands, rendering his complaint legally insufficient and "prima facie suspicious." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Atrocities Act) dismissed the petitioner Ramaoutar's plea under Section 173(4) BNSS to register an FIR against defendants Karan Singh and others. The court found that the core dispute was over land possession and a pathway between adjoining fields, not an atrocity case, and that preliminary investigation revealed no substantiating evidence for allegations of caste-based abuse or threats to life. The petitioner was deemed to have withheld material facts (police action under Sections 126/135 BNSS against both parties) and approached with unclean hands, rendering his complaint legally insufficient and "prima facie suspicious." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case