Ram Avtar vs Karan SIngh — 71/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th April 2026.
Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPAU010008382026
Filing Number
803/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
71/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Special Judge (SC/ST ACT) Auraiya
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ram Avtar
Adv. Arvind kumar
Respondent(s)
Karan SIngh
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Special Judge (SC/ST ACT) Auraiya
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 26-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 18-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Atrocities Act) dismissed the petitioner Ramaoutar's plea under Section 173(4) BNSS to register an FIR against defendants Karan Singh and others. The court found that the core dispute was over land possession and a pathway between adjoining fields, not an atrocity case, and that preliminary investigation revealed no substantiating evidence for allegations of caste-based abuse or threats to life. The petitioner was deemed to have withheld material facts (police action under Sections 126/135 BNSS against both parties) and approached with unclean hands, rendering his complaint legally insufficient and "prima facie suspicious." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Atrocities Act) dismissed the petitioner Ramaoutar's plea under Section 173(4) BNSS to register an FIR against defendants Karan Singh and others. The court found that the core dispute was over land possession and a pathway between adjoining fields, not an atrocity case, and that preliminary investigation revealed no substantiating evidence for allegations of caste-based abuse or threats to life. The petitioner was deemed to have withheld material facts (police action under Sections 126/135 BNSS against both parties) and approached with unclean hands, rendering his complaint legally insufficient and "prima facie suspicious." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts