Sarman Lal vs U.P State Government — 307/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPAU010008292026

Filing Number

794/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

307/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Auraiya

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

91

Police Station

Kudarkot

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sarman Lal

    Adv. Ajit singh yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.U.P State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The District and Sessions Court, Auraiya, granted bail to accused Sarman Lal in a dowry death case (Crime No. 91/2025) under BNS Sections 80(2), 85, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that while Sarman Lal is accused of demanding additional dowry (₹40,000 and a Splendor motorcycle) from his daughter-in-law Rashmi, which allegedly led to her death by hanging, there was insufficient grounds to deny bail at this stage, as no eyewitness testimony exists, he has no prior criminal history, and the postmortem confirmed death by asphyxiation. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹1 lakh with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge Auraiya

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Auraiya

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 307/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District and Sessions Court, Auraiya, granted bail to accused Sarman Lal in a dowry death case (Crime No. 91/2025) under BNS Sections 80(2), 85, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that while Sarman Lal is accused of demanding additional dowry (₹40,000 and a Splendor motorcycle) from his daughter-in-law Rashmi, which allegedly led to her death by hanging, there was insufficient grounds to deny bail at this stage, as no eyewitness testimony exists, he has no prior criminal history, and the postmortem confirmed death by asphyxiation. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹1 lakh with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case