Sarman Lal vs U.P State Government — 307/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85,. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPAU010008292026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

794/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

307/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Auraiya

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

91

Police Station

Kudarkot

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85,
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

Sarman Lal

Adv. Ajit singh yadav

Respondent(s)

U.P State Government

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge Auraiya

10-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Hearing

24-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Bail Order

Case Summary The District and Sessions Court, Auraiya, granted bail to accused Sarman Lal in a dowry death case (Crime No. 91/2025) under BNS Sections 80(2), 85, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that while Sarman Lal is accused of demanding additional dowry (₹40,000 and a Splendor motorcycle) from his daughter-in-law Rashmi, which allegedly led to her death by hanging, there was insufficient grounds to deny bail at this stage, as no eyewitness testimony exists, he has no prior criminal history, and the postmortem confirmed death by asphyxiation. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹1 lakh with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District and Sessions Court, Auraiya, granted bail to accused Sarman Lal in a dowry death case (Crime No. 91/2025) under BNS Sections 80(2), 85, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that while Sarman Lal is accused of demanding additional dowry (₹40,000 and a Splendor motorcycle) from his daughter-in-law Rashmi, which allegedly led to her death by hanging, there was insufficient grounds to deny bail at this stage, as no eyewitness testimony exists, he has no prior criminal history, and the postmortem confirmed death by asphyxiation. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹1 lakh with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case