Sarman Lal vs U.P State Government — 307/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80(2),85,. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPAU010008292026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
794/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
307/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge Auraiya
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
91
Police Station
Kudarkot
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sarman Lal
Adv. Ajit singh yadav
Respondent(s)
U.P State Government
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge Auraiya
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 24-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The District and Sessions Court, Auraiya, granted bail to accused Sarman Lal in a dowry death case (Crime No. 91/2025) under BNS Sections 80(2), 85, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that while Sarman Lal is accused of demanding additional dowry (₹40,000 and a Splendor motorcycle) from his daughter-in-law Rashmi, which allegedly led to her death by hanging, there was insufficient grounds to deny bail at this stage, as no eyewitness testimony exists, he has no prior criminal history, and the postmortem confirmed death by asphyxiation. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹1 lakh with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The District and Sessions Court, Auraiya, granted bail to accused Sarman Lal in a dowry death case (Crime No. 91/2025) under BNS Sections 80(2), 85, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that while Sarman Lal is accused of demanding additional dowry (₹40,000 and a Splendor motorcycle) from his daughter-in-law Rashmi, which allegedly led to her death by hanging, there was insufficient grounds to deny bail at this stage, as no eyewitness testimony exists, he has no prior criminal history, and the postmortem confirmed death by asphyxiation. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹1 lakh with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts