Indal singh vs U.P State Government — 302/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPAU010008122026
Filing Number
777/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
302/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Special Judge (Sc/ST Act) Auraiya
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED/GRANTED
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
126
Police Station
Phaphund
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Indal singh
Adv. Brajendra Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.U.P State Government
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Summary The Special Judge granted bail to accused Indal Singh in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found that while serious allegations of assault and abusive language were made by the complainant, the defense raised credible doubts regarding the FIR's timing (filed a day after the incident), inconsistencies in witness statements, and the absence of caste-based language in the victim's recorded statements. The court approved bail with a personal bond of ₹25,000 and one surety of equal amount, relying on Supreme Court guidelines and the absence of prior misuse of interim bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge (Sc/ST Act) Auraiya
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge (Sc/ST Act) Auraiya
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 302/2026
Summary The Special Judge granted bail to accused Indal Singh in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court found that while serious allegations of assault and abusive language were made by the complainant, the defense raised credible doubts regarding the FIR's timing (filed a day after the incident), inconsistencies in witness statements, and the absence of caste-based language in the victim's recorded statements. The court approved bail with a personal bond of ₹25,000 and one surety of equal amount, relying on Supreme Court guidelines and the absence of prior misuse of interim bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts