Pradeep Yadav Alias Bablu Alias Jhabara vs U.P State Government — 275/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),191(3),109,352,126(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPAU010007412026

Case disposed

Filing Number

711/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Auraiya

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

187

Police Station

Achhalda

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),191(3),109,352,126(2)

Petitioner(s)

Pradeep Yadav Alias Bablu Alias Jhabara

Adv. Dharmendra singh Sengar

Respondent(s)

U.P State Government

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge Auraiya

10-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Hearing

27-02-2026

Hearing

24-02-2026

Hearing

17-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Bail Order

Summary The District and Sessions Court, Auriya, rejected the bail application of accused Pradeep Yadav (alias Bablu, alias Jhabra) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 352, and 126(2). The court found that the accused, along with co-accused, allegedly fired at the complainant with intent to cause grievous harm. Considering the serious nature of the offense, the accused's extensive criminal history (30 prior cases), and ongoing investigation, the court held insufficient grounds to grant bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District and Sessions Court, Auriya, rejected the bail application of accused Pradeep Yadav (alias Bablu, alias Jhabra) in a case involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 352, and 126(2). The court found that the accused, along with co-accused, allegedly fired at the complainant with intent to cause grievous harm. Considering the serious nature of the offense, the accused's extensive criminal history (30 prior cases), and ongoing investigation, the court held insufficient grounds to grant bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case