Maneesh Kushwaha vs U.P State Government — 277/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),317(2),338,336(3),340(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPAU010007392026

Filing Number

709/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

277/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

11-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No - 1 Auraiya

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Auraiya

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),317(2),338,336(3),340(2)

Information Technology Act Section 66D

Petitioner(s)

1.Maneesh Kushwaha

Adv. Dinesh Kumar Rajput

Respondent(s)

1.U.P State Government

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
10-Mar-2026

Bail OrderView PDF

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Auraiya, dismissed the second anticipatory bail petition (No. 277/2026) filed by Manish Kushwaha, accused of cyber fraud involving cheating a woman of ₹33,63,925 through fake online impersonation promising gold and jewelry. The court rejected the bail plea despite finding the accused was not named in the initial FIR, holding that anticipatory bail is an exceptional remedy requiring strong reasons, particularly in grave offences carrying severe punishment under BNS sections 318(4), 317(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and IT Act section 66D. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
10-Mar-2026

Disposed

Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No - 1 Auraiya
09-Mar-2026

Hearing

Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No - 1 Auraiya
27-Feb-2026

Hearing

District and Sessions Judge Auraiya
24-Feb-2026

Hearing

District and Sessions Judge Auraiya
17-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
17-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 277/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Auraiya, dismissed the second anticipatory bail petition (No. 277/2026) filed by Manish Kushwaha, accused of cyber fraud involving cheating a woman of ₹33,63,925 through fake online impersonation promising gold and jewelry. The court rejected the bail plea despite finding the accused was not named in the initial FIR, holding that anticipatory bail is an exceptional remedy requiring strong reasons, particularly in grave offences carrying severe punishment under BNS sections 318(4), 317(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and IT Act section 66D. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.