State Government vs Satendra Kumar — 8/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 306. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 01st April 2026.
Session Trial
CNR: UPAU010001732018
Filing Number
132/2018
Filing Date
17-01-2018
Registration No
8/2018
Registration Date
17-01-2018
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No - 2 Auraiya
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
326
Police Station
Bela
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Respondent(s)
Satendra Kumar
Nagendra Pratap Singh @ Yogendra
Suneeta @ Mili
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court No - 2 Auraiya
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/S 313
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Statement U/S 313 |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted three defendants (Satendra Kumar, Nagendra Pratap Singh alias Yogendra, and Sunita alias Nimli) of charges under Section 306 IPC (abetment of suicide). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendants instigated the deceased Jaswant Singh to commit suicide, as the evidence presented lacked direct proof of instigation, criminal intent, proximity to the suicide, and the alleged suicide note and rope seizure could not be properly corroborated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted three defendants (Satendra Kumar, Nagendra Pratap Singh alias Yogendra, and Sunita alias Nimli) of charges under Section 306 IPC (abetment of suicide). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendants instigated the deceased Jaswant Singh to commit suicide, as the evidence presented lacked direct proof of instigation, criminal intent, proximity to the suicide, and the alleged suicide note and rope seizure could not be properly corroborated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts