State Government vs Surendra singh yadav — 6/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.

Special Trial

CNR: UPAU010000652018

Case disposed

Filing Number

6/2018

Filing Date

04-01-2018

Registration No

6/2018

Registration Date

04-01-2018

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Special Judge (SC/ST ACT) Auraiya

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

174

Police Station

Bidhuna

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(2)v

Petitioner(s)

State Government

Respondent(s)

Surendra singh yadav

dharmendra kumar

pradhumna kumar yadav

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Special Judge (SC/ST ACT) Auraiya

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Judgement

10-03-2026

Evidence

26-02-2026

Evidence

21-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary The court acquitted defendants Dharmendra Kumar and Pradyumn Kumar Singh of charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 (causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation to cause fear) and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt: the complainant and victim witness contradicted the allegations in their testimonies, and no prosecution witness substantiated the narrative that the accused assaulted the victim or made caste-based slurs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted defendants Dharmendra Kumar and Pradyumn Kumar Singh of charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 (causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and criminal intimidation to cause fear) and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt: the complainant and victim witness contradicted the allegations in their testimonies, and no prosecution witness substantiated the narrative that the accused assaulted the victim or made caste-based slurs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case