Shahanshah vs Mohammad Wasi veg — 180/2018

Case under --- Section 7(1). Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed Otherwise on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Original Suit

CNR: UPAN120022012018

Filing Number

263/2018

Filing Date

15-Mar-2018

Registration No

180/2018

Registration Date

16-Mar-2018

Court

Outlying Court Complex, Tanda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed Otherwise

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

--- Section 7(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shahanshah

    Adv. Shamsher Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohammad Wasi veg

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Civil Judge of Ambedkarnagar dismissed Original Suit No. 180/2018 (Shahnshah Aalam v. Mohammad Wasi Veg) on 09.03.2026 for non-prosecution due to absence of both parties despite repeated calls. The court found that both parties demonstrated lack of interest in the proceedings by failing to appear or file any application for adjournment, warranting dismissal under procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  4. 11-Dec-2025

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  5. 26-Sep-2025

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  6. 09-Jul-2025

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  7. 03-Apr-2025

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  8. 06-Feb-2025

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  9. 13-Nov-2024

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  10. 16-Aug-2024

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  11. 31-May-2024

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  12. 06-Mar-2024

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  13. 19-Jan-2024

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  14. 08-Dec-2023

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  15. 04-Oct-2023

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  16. 11-Jul-2023

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  17. 17-May-2023

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  18. 19-Apr-2023

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  19. 21-Feb-2023

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  20. 21-Dec-2022

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  21. 07-Nov-2022

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  22. 30-Aug-2022

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  23. 13-Aug-2022

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  24. 12-Aug-2022

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  25. 17-May-2022

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  26. 05-Apr-2022

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  27. 11-Jan-2022

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  28. 01-Sep-2021

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  29. 01-Jul-2021

    W.S.

  30. 29-Apr-2021

    W.S.

  31. 23-Mar-2021

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  32. 18-Dec-2020

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  33. 07-Jul-2020

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  34. 04-May-2020

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  35. 30-Mar-2020

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  36. 25-Mar-2020

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  37. 02-Mar-2020

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  38. 11-Feb-2020

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  39. 15-Jan-2019

    W.S.

  40. 13-Jan-2019

    Appearance

  41. 05-Dec-2018

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  42. 04-Oct-2018

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  43. 04-Jul-2018

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  44. 10-May-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  45. 15-Mar-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 180/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Civil Judge of Ambedkarnagar dismissed Original Suit No. 180/2018 (Shahnshah Aalam v. Mohammad Wasi Veg) on 09.03.2026 for non-prosecution due to absence of both parties despite repeated calls. The court found that both parties demonstrated lack of interest in the proceedings by failing to appear or file any application for adjournment, warranting dismissal under procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case