rajaram vs hariram Advocate - sunil kumar shrivastav — 337/2013

Case under --- Section 7-1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 23-Apr-2026

Original Suit

CNR: UPAN120002312013

Filing Date

30-May-2013

Registration No

337/2013

Registration Date

30-May-2013

Court

Outlying Court Complex, Tanda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

--- Section 7-1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.rajaram

    Adv. ram dhari yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.hariram Advocate - sunil kumar shrivastav

Case History

  1. 23-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  3. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  4. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  5. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  6. 14-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  7. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  8. 11-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  9. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  10. 20-May-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  11. 02-May-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  12. 01-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  13. 15-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  14. 14-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  15. 09-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  16. 12-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  17. 11-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  18. 03-May-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  19. 14-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  20. 10-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  21. 13-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  22. 16-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  23. 26-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  24. 06-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  25. 27-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  26. 14-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  27. 25-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  28. 24-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  29. 24-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  30. 13-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  31. 12-May-2021

    Evidence

  32. 13-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  33. 17-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  34. 21-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  35. 10-Nov-2020

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court decided two issues in this civil suit for permanent injunction regarding disputed property. On Issue 2 (sufficiency of valuation), the court held that the plaintiff's valuation of Rs. 1,000 based on the property value was appropriate and rejected the defendant's challenge. On Issue 3 (adequacy of court fee paid), the court found the plaintiff had paid sufficient court fee of Rs. 22.50 under the Court Fees Act, 1870. Both issues were decided in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, with the case adjourned for plaintiff's evidence on January 21, 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  36. 10-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  37. 07-Nov-2020

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  38. 20-Oct-2020

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  39. 16-Sep-2020

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  40. 28-May-2020

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  41. 19-Mar-2020

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  42. 04-Nov-2019

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  43. 03-Jul-2019

    W.S.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  44. 13-Mar-2019

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  45. 31-Jan-2019

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  46. 20-Dec-2018

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  47. 13-Nov-2018

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  48. 04-Sep-2018

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  49. 31-Oct-2017

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  50. 27-Sep-2017

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  51. 24-May-2017

    Disposal of Other Appl.

  52. 18-Apr-2017

    Disposal of Other Appl.

  53. 04-Jan-2017

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  54. 23-Feb-2016

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  55. 05-Jan-2016

    Disposal of Other Appl.

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  56. 30-Oct-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 30-May-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 337/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court decided two issues in this civil suit for permanent injunction regarding disputed property. On Issue 2 (sufficiency of valuation), the court held that the plaintiff's valuation of Rs. 1,000 based on the property value was appropriate and rejected the defendant's challenge. On Issue 3 (adequacy of court fee paid), the court found the plaintiff had paid sufficient court fee of Rs. 22.50 under the Court Fees Act, 1870. Both issues were decided in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, with the case adjourned for plaintiff's evidence on January 21, 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case