Mohd Anish vs Shakeel Ahmad — 178/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed Otherwise on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil Suit

CNR: UPAN120001942024

Filing Number

217/2024

Filing Date

22-Mar-2024

Registration No

178/2024

Registration Date

28-Mar-2024

Court

Outlying Court Complex, Tanda

Judge

1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed Otherwise

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohd Anish

    Adv. Shailendra Kumar mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shakeel Ahmad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Civil Judge (JD) Ambedkarnagar dismissed Original Suit No. 178/2024 (Mohammad Anis v. Shakeel Ahmad) due to non-appearance of both parties despite repeated calls on 12.03.2026. The court found that both parties' conduct demonstrated lack of interest in the proceedings and no adjournment application was filed, warranting dismissal in their absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  5. 29-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  6. 28-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  7. 03-May-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  8. 03-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  9. 28-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  10. 02-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda

  11. 13-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 22-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 178/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Civil Judge (JD) Ambedkarnagar dismissed Original Suit No. 178/2024 (Mohammad Anis v. Shakeel Ahmad) due to non-appearance of both parties despite repeated calls on 12.03.2026. The court found that both parties' conduct demonstrated lack of interest in the proceedings and no adjournment application was filed, warranting dismissal in their absence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case