HOOSILA PARSAD vs RAM DAS — 299/2013
Case under --- Section 7-1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed/Rejected Otherwise on 11th March 2026.
Original Suit
CNR: UPAN120001632013
Filing Date
18-May-2013
Registration No
299/2013
Registration Date
18-May-2013
Court
Outlying Court Complex, Tanda
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed/Rejected Otherwise
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HOOSILA PARSAD
Adv. RADHESHAYAM MAURYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAM DAS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Civil Judge (JD) Ambedkar Nagar dismissed Original Suit No. 299/2013 (Housila Prasad v. Ramdas) on 11.03.2026 for non-prosecution. Despite repeated court calls, both parties remained absent and filed no adjournment applications, demonstrating lack of interest in the proceedings, warranting dismissal under procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
05-Dec-2025
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
03-Nov-2025
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
22-Sep-2025
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
16-Jul-2025
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
24-Mar-2025
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
13-Dec-2024
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
22-Oct-2024
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
26-Jul-2024
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
07-May-2024
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
16-Apr-2024
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
01-Apr-2024
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
24-Jan-2024
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
23-Jan-2024
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
04-Dec-2023
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
17-Nov-2023
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
14-Jul-2023
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
11-May-2023
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
04-Apr-2023
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
08-Feb-2023
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
22-Nov-2022
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
12-Oct-2022
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
29-Jul-2022
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
11-May-2022
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
22-Nov-2021
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
28-Oct-2021
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
12-Aug-2021
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
29-Jul-2021
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
27-Jul-2021
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
19-Apr-2021
W.S.
-
25-Jan-2021
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
22-Dec-2020
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
01-Sep-2020
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
26-May-2020
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
21-Apr-2020
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
21-Jan-2020
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
15-Nov-2019
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
18-Mar-2019
W.S.
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
26-Dec-2018
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
13-Nov-2018
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
25-Sep-2018
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
30-Jul-2018
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
14-May-2018
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
16-Nov-2017
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
07-Nov-2017
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
08-Aug-2017
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
16-May-2017
Appearance
-
08-Mar-2017
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
03-Mar-2016
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
06-Dec-2015
Appearance
Civil Judge Junior Division Tanda
-
24-Sep-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 299/2013
Summary The Civil Judge (JD) Ambedkar Nagar dismissed Original Suit No. 299/2013 (Housila Prasad v. Ramdas) on 11.03.2026 for non-prosecution. Despite repeated court calls, both parties remained absent and filed no adjournment applications, demonstrating lack of interest in the proceedings, warranting dismissal under procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts