RAM CHANDER AND OTHERS vs SHRI PATI Advocate - Ram Dhari Yadav — 7/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 115. Disposed: Contested--CONTESTED on 30th April 2026.
Civil Revision
CNR: UPAN010018532024
Filing Number
213/2024
Filing Date
26-Apr-2024
Registration No
7/2024
Registration Date
26-Apr-2024
Court
DIstrict and Sessions Judge
Judge
10-Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONTESTED
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAM CHANDER AND OTHERS
Adv. GHANSHYAM MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI PATI Advocate - Ram Dhari Yadav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The High Court (District Judge) of Ambedkarnagar accepted the civil revision petition and set aside the lower court's order dated 06-04-2024 that rejected the delay condonation application (Section 5, Limitation Act). The court found that the lower court failed to exercise its discretionary powers properly, did not consider the merits of the case, ignored principles of natural justice, and failed to apply established legal precedents regarding liberal consideration of delay applications. The case involves a civil suit (No. 510/2001) where the plaintiff died during proceedings, and the defendants' heir sought to revive the case with a belated application. The court remitted the matter back to the lower court to reconsider the delay condonation application on merits with liberal interpretation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
30-Sep-2025
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
28-Aug-2025
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
18-Jul-2025
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
03-May-2025
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
24-Mar-2025
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
13-Feb-2025
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
10-Jan-2025
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
23-Nov-2024
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
29-Oct-2024
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
07-Oct-2024
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
-
17-Sep-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Aug-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jul-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jul-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
30-May-2024
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2024
Summary The High Court (District Judge) of Ambedkarnagar accepted the civil revision petition and set aside the lower court's order dated 06-04-2024 that rejected the delay condonation application (Section 5, Limitation Act). The court found that the lower court failed to exercise its discretionary powers properly, did not consider the merits of the case, ignored principles of natural justice, and failed to apply established legal precedents regarding liberal consideration of delay applications. The case involves a civil suit (No. 510/2001) where the plaintiff died during proceedings, and the defendants' heir sought to revive the case with a belated application. The court remitted the matter back to the lower court to reconsider the delay condonation application on merits with liberal interpretation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts