KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS vs U.P State — 253/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),115(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPAN010010492026

Filing Number

997/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

253/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DIstrict and Sessions Judge

Judge

2-Special Judge (Sc/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),115(2),352,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. Raj Narayan Giri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.U.P State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Ambedkar Nagar granted bail to five accused persons (Krishna Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Prabhjat Urf Pradumn, Satrupa, and Uma) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(1)(d) and 3(2)(va). The court found insufficient material evidence of criminal history against the accused and determined that bail conditions could adequately secure their presence, therefore accepting their bail plea on furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge (Sc/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge (Sc/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 253/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Ambedkar Nagar granted bail to five accused persons (Krishna Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Prabhjat Urf Pradumn, Satrupa, and Uma) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(1)(d) and 3(2)(va). The court found insufficient material evidence of criminal history against the accused and determined that bail conditions could adequately secure their presence, therefore accepting their bail plea on furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case