KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS vs U.P State — 253/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),115(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPAN010010492026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

997/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

253/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

DIstrict and Sessions Judge

Judge

2-Special Judge (SC/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),115(2),352,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS

Adv. Raj Narayan Giri

Respondent(s)

U.P State

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Special Judge (SC/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)

11-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Hearing

27-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Ambedkar Nagar granted bail to five accused persons (Krishna Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Prabhjat Urf Pradumn, Satrupa, and Uma) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(1)(d) and 3(2)(va). The court found insufficient material evidence of criminal history against the accused and determined that bail conditions could adequately secure their presence, therefore accepting their bail plea on furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Ambedkar Nagar granted bail to five accused persons (Krishna Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Prabhjat Urf Pradumn, Satrupa, and Uma) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 352, 351(3) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(1)(d) and 3(2)(va). The court found insufficient material evidence of criminal history against the accused and determined that bail conditions could adequately secure their presence, therefore accepting their bail plea on furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DIstrict and Sessions Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case