Sanjay Kumar vs Durga Prashad Tiwari others — 48/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4) BNSS. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th March 2026.
Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPAN010010272026
Filing Number
976/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
48/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
DIstrict and Sessions Judge
Judge
2-Special Judge (Sc/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 17-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sanjay Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Durga Prashad Tiwari others
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge dismissed the petitioner's complaint under Section 173(4) BNSS, finding that the dispute regarding motorcycle finance installment payments is fundamentally a civil contract matter, not a criminal case. The court held that the petitioner failed to provide payment receipts and presented vague allegations against unknown agents, while the finance company's records showed no outstanding dues—indicating an attempt to criminalize a purely civil dispute for extra-judicial pressure, which constitutes abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge (Sc/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge (Sc/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge (Sc/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge (Sc/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge (Sc/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge (Sc/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 48/2026
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge dismissed the petitioner's complaint under Section 173(4) BNSS, finding that the dispute regarding motorcycle finance installment payments is fundamentally a civil contract matter, not a criminal case. The court held that the petitioner failed to provide payment receipts and presented vague allegations against unknown agents, while the finance company's records showed no outstanding dues—indicating an attempt to criminalize a purely civil dispute for extra-judicial pressure, which constitutes abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts