KANCHAN YADAV vs U.P State — 238/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPAN010010122026

Filing Number

961/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

238/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DIstrict and Sessions Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

83

Police Station

JALALPUR

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANCHAN YADAV

    Adv. Krishan Kumar Gaur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.U.P State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Ambedkar Nagar granted conditional bail to accused Kanchan Yadav and Suman Yadav in a case involving charges under IPC sections 323, 325, 308, 504, 506, and 427 (related to rioting and assault). The court found that since the case involved cross-complaints from both parties, it could not definitively determine who was the aggressor at this stage; the accused had not been arrested during investigation, had cooperated with authorities, and had not breached interim bail conditions. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including court attendance and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 238/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Ambedkar Nagar granted conditional bail to accused Kanchan Yadav and Suman Yadav in a case involving charges under IPC sections 323, 325, 308, 504, 506, and 427 (related to rioting and assault). The court found that since the case involved cross-complaints from both parties, it could not definitively determine who was the aggressor at this stage; the accused had not been arrested during investigation, had cooperated with authorities, and had not breached interim bail conditions. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including court attendance and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case