UMER AHMAD vs U.P State — 243/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--CONTESTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPAN010010072026

Filing Number

956/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

243/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DIstrict and Sessions Judge

Judge

10-Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONTESTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

TANDA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMER AHMAD

    Adv. Suryansh Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.U.P State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the bail application of Omair Ahmad, who was accused of committing fraud and forgery involving fake insurance bonds and fraudulent bank documents under IPC Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), and 316(5). The court found substantial evidence of the accused's involvement in creating counterfeit bonds, facilitating unauthorized withdrawals from multiple accounts, and conspiracy with bank employees, making the offense serious in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 243/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the bail application of Omair Ahmad, who was accused of committing fraud and forgery involving fake insurance bonds and fraudulent bank documents under IPC Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), and 316(5). The court found substantial evidence of the accused's involvement in creating counterfeit bonds, facilitating unauthorized withdrawals from multiple accounts, and conspiracy with bank employees, making the offense serious in nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case