PINKU SINGH ALIAS RUDRA PRATAP SINGH vs U.P State — 213/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--CONTESTED on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPAN010008512026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
801/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
213/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
DIstrict and Sessions Judge
Judge
10-Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONTESTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
RAJESULTANPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PINKU SINGH ALIAS RUDRA PRATAP SINGH
Adv. Narsingh Narayan Singh
Respondent(s)
U.P State
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 25-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court rejected the bail application of Pinku Singh Urf Rudra Pratap Singh in a case involving charges under IPC sections 140(1) and 105 (relating to kidnapping and murder). The court found that the allegations were serious in nature—the accused allegedly took the complainant's son from his house in a semi-conscious state on 11-02-2026, and the boy was subsequently found dead—and determined there was sufficient basis to deny bail as there existed a reasonable possibility of the accused influencing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the bail application of Pinku Singh Urf Rudra Pratap Singh in a case involving charges under IPC sections 140(1) and 105 (relating to kidnapping and murder). The court found that the allegations were serious in nature—the accused allegedly took the complainant's son from his house in a semi-conscious state on 11-02-2026, and the boy was subsequently found dead—and determined there was sufficient basis to deny bail as there existed a reasonable possibility of the accused influencing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts