PINKU SINGH ALIAS RUDRA PRATAP SINGH vs U.P State — 213/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--CONTESTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPAN010008512026

Filing Number

801/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

213/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

DIstrict and Sessions Judge

Judge

10-Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONTESTED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

RAJESULTANPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PINKU SINGH ALIAS RUDRA PRATAP SINGH

    Adv. Narsingh Narayan Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.U.P State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the bail application of Pinku Singh Urf Rudra Pratap Singh in a case involving charges under IPC sections 140(1) and 105 (relating to kidnapping and murder). The court found that the allegations were serious in nature—the accused allegedly took the complainant's son from his house in a semi-conscious state on 11-02-2026, and the boy was subsequently found dead—and determined there was sufficient basis to deny bail as there existed a reasonable possibility of the accused influencing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge court No.1

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 213/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the bail application of Pinku Singh Urf Rudra Pratap Singh in a case involving charges under IPC sections 140(1) and 105 (relating to kidnapping and murder). The court found that the allegations were serious in nature—the accused allegedly took the complainant's son from his house in a semi-conscious state on 11-02-2026, and the boy was subsequently found dead—and determined there was sufficient basis to deny bail as there existed a reasonable possibility of the accused influencing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case