NITIN UPADHYAY ALIAS NITENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAY vs U.P State — 196/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPAN010007482026

Filing Number

699/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

196/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DIstrict and Sessions Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

171

Police Station

BHITI

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITIN UPADHYAY ALIAS NITENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAY

    Adv. PREM PRAKASH TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.U.P State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Session Court, Ambedkar Nagar granted conditional anticipatory bail to Nitin Upadhyay under Section 438 CrPC in a case involving embezzlement charges under IPC Sections 408 and 120B related to a government school construction project. The court found the case to be civil in nature and noted that the investigation lacked proper examination of contractual agreements (MOU) between the company and contractor, and no evidence of funds reaching the applicant's account was established. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including court attendance, cooperation during trial, and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 196/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Session Court, Ambedkar Nagar granted conditional anticipatory bail to Nitin Upadhyay under Section 438 CrPC in a case involving embezzlement charges under IPC Sections 408 and 120B related to a government school construction project. The court found the case to be civil in nature and noted that the investigation lacked proper examination of contractual agreements (MOU) between the company and contractor, and no evidence of funds reaching the applicant's account was established. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including court attendance, cooperation during trial, and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case