U.P State Government vs ramdin Advocate - N N Singh — 100012/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.

SC/ST

CNR: UPAN010004282015

Case disposed

Filing Date

12-02-2015

Registration No

100012/2015

Registration Date

12-02-2015

Court

DIstrict and Sessions Judge

Judge

2-Special Judge (SC/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules Section 3(1)10

Petitioner(s)

U.P State Government

Adv. po

Respondent(s)

ramdin Advocate - N N Singh

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Special Judge (SC/ST Prev. of Atroci Act)

17-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Judgement

06-03-2026

Arguments

27-02-2026

Arguments

23-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The Special Court for SC/ST Act cases in Ambedkar Nagar acquitted accused Ramdeen of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(x), finding the prosecution's case built on doubtful evidence. The court noted serious contradictions in the complainant witness's testimony regarding the incident location, timing, and her presence at the crime scene, along with the delayed filing of the FIR (approximately three months), which weakened the prosecution's narrative beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Special Court for SC/ST Act cases in Ambedkar Nagar acquitted accused Ramdeen of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(x), finding the prosecution's case built on doubtful evidence. The court noted serious contradictions in the complainant witness's testimony regarding the incident location, timing, and her presence at the crime scene, along with the delayed filing of the FIR (approximately three months), which weakened the prosecution's narrative beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DIstrict and Sessions Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case