DEEP NARAYAN SHARMA vs U.P State — 119/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPAN010004242026
Filing Number
391/2026
Filing Date
29-Jan-2026
Registration No
119/2026
Registration Date
29-Jan-2026
Court
DIstrict and Sessions Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
213
Police Station
AKBARPUR
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEP NARAYAN SHARMA
Adv. Anand Kumar Dwivedi
Respondent(s)
-
1.U.P State
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of Ambedkar Nagar rejected the anticipatory bail application of Deepa Narayan Sharma under Section 438 CrPC. The applicant was accused of cheating, forgery, intimidation, and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 506, and 34, involving fraudulent transfer of an elderly victim's agricultural land through coercion and forged documents. The court found the charges prima facie serious (punishable up to life imprisonment) and noted the applicant's criminal history of nine prior cases involving similar fraud offenses, characterizing him as a habitual criminal with a criminal disposition, thereby making him ineligible for pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 119/2026
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of Ambedkar Nagar rejected the anticipatory bail application of Deepa Narayan Sharma under Section 438 CrPC. The applicant was accused of cheating, forgery, intimidation, and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 506, and 34, involving fraudulent transfer of an elderly victim's agricultural land through coercion and forged documents. The court found the charges prima facie serious (punishable up to life imprisonment) and noted the applicant's criminal history of nine prior cases involving similar fraud offenses, characterizing him as a habitual criminal with a criminal disposition, thereby making him ineligible for pre-arrest bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts