Dharmendra vs State Government — 731/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPAL010014782026

Filing Number

1380/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

731/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District judge

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dharmendra

    Adv. Heera Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court of Aligarh rejected the bail petition filed by accused Dharmendra Pratap Singh in a murder case (FIR 632/2025 under IPC Section 103). The court found that the accused, along with co-accused Madhu (the victim's wife), allegedly strangled the victim Sachin to death due to an illicit relationship between Dharmendra and Madhu, with the postmortem confirming death by asphyxiation through strangulation. Given the grave nature of the offense, the accused's active role, and the strong prima facie evidence against him, the court deemed bail inappropriate and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Order

    District judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District judge

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 731/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court of Aligarh rejected the bail petition filed by accused Dharmendra Pratap Singh in a murder case (FIR 632/2025 under IPC Section 103). The court found that the accused, along with co-accused Madhu (the victim's wife), allegedly strangled the victim Sachin to death due to an illicit relationship between Dharmendra and Madhu, with the postmortem confirming death by asphyxiation through strangulation. Given the grave nature of the offense, the accused's active role, and the strong prima facie evidence against him, the court deemed bail inappropriate and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case