Manish Pandey vs State of U.P. — 944/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305A,317(2),317(4),317(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPAD010026272026

Filing Number

2291/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

944/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Special Judge Ec Act

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

164

Police Station

HANDIA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305A,317(2),317(4),317(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manish Pandey

    Adv. Gaurav Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to Manish Pandey in a theft case (FIR 164/2025) under BNS sections 331(4), 305(A), 317(2), 317(4), and 317(5). The court found insufficient evidence linking the petitioner to the crimes—the FIR was initially filed against unknown persons, the recovered stolen goods lacked credible witness testimony, and a co-accused had already been granted bail on the same recovered property. The court ordered Pandey's release on two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each plus personal bond with an undertaking to appear at trial dates and cooperate in proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge Ec Act

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge Ec Act

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 944/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Manish Pandey in a theft case (FIR 164/2025) under BNS sections 331(4), 305(A), 317(2), 317(4), and 317(5). The court found insufficient evidence linking the petitioner to the crimes—the FIR was initially filed against unknown persons, the recovered stolen goods lacked credible witness testimony, and a co-accused had already been granted bail on the same recovered property. The court ordered Pandey's release on two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each plus personal bond with an undertaking to appear at trial dates and cooperate in proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case